Skip to content

Method · AFM

Atomic force microscopy in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany

Local surface topography and height differences measured with a scanning probe. What it answers, what it cannot establish on its own, what a laboratory will ask, and which Dutch, Belgian and German facilities publish it — named, with their sources.

What it answers

  • What is the roughness of a small area, down to sub-nanometre height differences?
  • How high are steps, grains or other nanoscale features?
  • Did polishing, deposition or etching change the nanoscale topography?

What it cannot establish alone

  • Determine chemical identity from topography alone; chemical analysis needs a separate or specialised coupled method.
  • Reproduce every narrow trench or steep sidewall: tip geometry limits access and affects apparent lateral dimensions.
  • Represent a whole component with a single small scan; roughness depends on scan size and data processing.
  • Guarantee an undisturbed surface when the sample is soft, mobile or poorly attached.

Before you contact a laboratory

What a laboratory will ask.

A laboratory can say whether it can help only when these are known. Unknowns are fine; say so.

  • Material, sample dimensions and the location of the surface to scan.
  • Expected roughness, feature height and lateral size, and the requested scan area.
  • Whether probe interaction is acceptable and whether the surface is soft, sticky or loosely attached.
  • Air or liquid measurement, number of locations and the roughness parameters or step heights required.

A question a laboratory can answer

We polish sapphire substrates for thin-film deposition and need roughness over 5 × 5 µm and 20 × 20 µm areas on three substrates, before and after cleaning.

Each laboratory below can turn these into an editable enquiry draft. Go to the laboratories

Laboratory evidence · AFM

Laboratories that publish AFM

Named facilities whose official pages describe AFM, each with its source, the dates behind it and what is still unconfirmed. Up to 12 per search, ordered by review level and then alphabetically — not ranked by suitability.

Start typing to see the cities the catalogue holds for this method. The city must match exactly: “Ede” does not find Enschede, and there is no distance search. Changing the method keeps your country and city.

An independent directory, not a booking service. Laboratories are listed from their own public pages. None has endorsed Argentum Field, paid for its position or seen this search.

For every laboratory below, whether it can accept your sample, external work or a booking — and its current configuration, availability, price and turnaround — needs the laboratory’s own confirmation. Cards show only what differs from this.

12 laboratories · AFM · all available countries

More laboratories match than the 12 shown. The cut follows source review status and then alphabetical order, not suitability — choose a city below, or a country above, to see others.

How to read a result
Access route
How the laboratory’s own page says outside users can work with it, read from that page by an AI assessment. It does not mean your request will be accepted.
Not yet assessed
Nobody has read the practical details from the source yet. Open the source; the access route and sample limits are unknown, not absent.
Public source
Extracted from an official page. A research lead; nobody has checked it.
AI-normalised
Structured by a pipeline from an official page, with its source and retrieval date. Still a lead.
Human reviewed
A named reviewer confirmed the cited source supports this method. The laboratory has not agreed to anything.
Dates
Under “Evidence and dates” on each card. Retrieved: when the catalogue recorded the source. Assessed: when practical text was read. Source updated: the date the page itself shows. None is a check that the instrument runs today.
Attribution
A card says so when a source ties the capability to a wider institution rather than this laboratory. That does not establish who owns the instrument.

More on the levels: what each evidence level means and never means.

Select two or three laboratories to compare their evidence and what remains unknown.

  1. Advanced Analytics microscopy – MicroDiagnostics

    Leipzig · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-23
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://www.izi.fraunhofer.de/en/central-facilities/advanced-analytics-technology-platform/microscopy.html
    Retrieved
    2026-10-23
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  2. AG Schmidt-Mende – Hybrid Nanostructures laboratory, GebäudeP

    Konstanz · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-23
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://www.schmidt-mende.uni-konstanz.de/research/laboratories/
    Retrieved
    2026-10-23
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  3. AMO – AMICA cleanroom

    Aachen · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Measurement service — the source describes access for external users
    Published limits
    • Sample limit The Veeco Dimension 3100 entry lists 6-inch wafers; the Bruker Icon entry lists 8-inch wafers. Confirm the instrument and handling limits for your specimen. source (opens in a new tab)
    • Measurement mode The Bruker Icon entry lists topography, electrical/conductive measurements, KPFM and magnetic measurements; special applications need special samples. source (opens in a new tab)
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-22Claims assessed 2026-10-27
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical evidence · AI source assessment, not confirmed by the laboratory

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://www.amo.de/en/what-we-do/cleanroom-technology/
    Retrieved
    2026-10-22
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  4. AMOLF NanoLab Amsterdam

    Amsterdam · Netherlands · AFM

    Access
    Equipment use — the source describes access for external users
    Published limits
    • The historical Veeco citation returned HTTP 404 in this tool. A current official AFM page was found; its FastScan specifications must not be merged with historical Veeco modes or limits.
    • The historical Veeco AFM citation returned HTTP 404 on 2026-10-28. The separately assessed current AMOLF page describes a Bruker FastScan; old instrument modes must not be transferred to it.
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-08-29Claims assessed 2026-10-27
    Attribution
    Local attribution in catalogue evidence

    Practical evidence · AI source assessment, not confirmed by the laboratory

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Link status
    The historical Veeco AFM citation returned HTTP 404 on 2026-10-28. The separately assessed current AMOLF page describes a Bruker FastScan; old instrument modes must not be transferred to it.
    Recorded title
    Veeco Dimension 3100 AFM
    Retrieved
    2026-08-29
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  5. Analysis of Solid Surfaces – AFKO, Institute of Physics

    Chemnitz · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-22
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://www.tu-chemnitz.de/physik/AFKO/instrumentation.html.en
    Retrieved
    2026-10-22
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  6. Chemistry & Physics of Interfaces (CPI), IMTEK

    Freiburg · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-22
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://uni-freiburg.de/tf-imtek-cpi/scientific-instrumentation
    Retrieved
    2026-10-22
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  7. CoCooN (Conformal Coating of Nanomaterials)

    Ghent · Belgium · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-09-27
    Attribution
    Local attribution in catalogue evidence

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    Public evidence (Benelux R4 harvest)
    Retrieved
    2026-09-27
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  8. Core Facility Hohenheim – Imaging Unit CFH-IMG

    Stuttgart · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    • Source review (2026-10-29): The facility mentions external users. Its described independent user mode is for university members after safety and equipment training; confirm external access, suitability and availability.
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-23
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://cfh.uni-hohenheim.de/imaging.html
    Retrieved
    2026-10-23
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  9. DESY NanoLab – Centre for X-ray and NanoScience (CXNS)

    Hamburg · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Proposal-based access · Commercial enquiry · Research collaboration — the source describes access for external users
    Published limits
    unknown
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    • Sample size and material restrictions have not been established.
    • Proposal access, commercial inquiry and cooperation are different routes; none establishes availability for this request.
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-22Claims assessed 2026-10-27
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical evidence · AI source assessment, not confirmed by the laboratory

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://photon-science.desy.de/research/research_teams/x_ray_physics_and_nanoscience/desy_nanolab/index_eng.html
    Retrieved
    2026-10-22
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  10. DFI materials and surface characterization laboratories

    Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-22
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://dechema-dfi.de/geraeteausstattung.html
    Retrieved
    2026-10-22
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  11. DIK e.V. microscopy source inventory (undated brochure)

    Hannover · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-23
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://www.dikautschuk.de/fileadmin/files/infomaterial/dik_flyer_mikroskopie.pdf
    Retrieved
    2026-10-23
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
  12. DWI Material Surface Analytics Unit

    Aachen · Germany · AFM

    Access
    Not yet assessed — open the source for access and sample limits
    • Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed
    Evidence and dates
    Catalogue evidence
    AI-normalised public source
    Dates
    Catalogue retrieved 2026-10-23
    Attribution
    Institution/shared attribution; instrument ownership unconfirmed

    Practical details have not yet received a claim-specific source assessment.

    Catalogue record

    As recorded. A recorded title is catalogue metadata, not a statement that the page supports AFM. Practical details are AI source assessments of indexed official text; an assessment date is not a fresh fetch or a check that the instrument operates.

    Recorded title
    German source review: https://www.dwi.rwth-aachen.de/en/page/material-surface-analytics-unit
    Retrieved
    2026-10-23
    Reviewed
    Not recorded
Did this help you choose a next step?

Records your choice and basic search counters, not your location or the laboratories shown.

Not sure AFM answers your question? Describe your sample and question and the first answer suggests a method and leads, without an account.

Often combined with

Problems where it helps